![]() You guys are having a doozy of an argument, the latter stages of which I don't have anything to say about. Even if the window is bigger (wider or taller) than the actual screen, the full content (including the stuff which is outside) is grabbed.The "including the stuff which is outside" part was obviously making a reference to the previous clause "Even if the window is bigger (wider or taller) than the actual screen", and not to the "content" of the directory. ![]() Your quote is of the original hint is misread though. The window is a resizable widget that "shows" you the directory's content.In any case, those are just programming abstractions (I am a GUI programmer). A graphical widget that lets you peek into a directory. The window is just, like you defined above, a view into the context of a directory. When you close a window, you close the view and prevent the ability to see that _content_.Wrong. The window contains _content_ which is to be viewed. Incorrect again: A window is a GUI element and is defined as a new view.Agreed. Instead of saying 'full content', the user should have said full window or window in it's entirety. Given the above, the entire contents of window is not defined only by what is currently visible to the user, but what is not visible as well.īottom line: The hint's description is misleading. Anything that is outside the window - buttons, text, etc., is not part of the contents of a window, but belongs to the window itself. When you close a window, you close the view and prevent the ability to see that _content_.Ĭontent in this case is defined as all objects - text, images, frames, etc. Look.Ī window is a GUI element and is defined as a new view. Comparing a window to a folder is just flat out wrong. īut it's even better than that: Even if the window is bigger (wider or taller) than the actual screen, the full content (including the stuff which is outside) is grabbed. What you fail to read is the fact the hint also claimed that it will capture the full content (including the stuff which is outside). We are in agreement that the hint claimed that one could "capture windows which are larger than the screen. Tuo Poultry Shears: Noticing a theme with our test shears? Like several other competitors, the Tuo shears are great on skin, dreadful against bone.I believe you are the one that is incorrect.Kershaw Taskmaster Shears: These were excellent when it comes to shearing through skin, but they have not mastered the task of cutting through bone.Unless, that is, you want a pair of shears that only excels in snipping skin. Messermeister Poultry Shears: Highly recommended in cooking forums, not at all recommended by us.Excellent skin-snipping gave way to impossibility when it came time to cut through bone-and the straight-handled design offers no additional grip when exerting force. Kuhn Rikon Classic Snips: We had high hopes for these shears, but they let us down in our turkey test.Poor quality when it comes to snipping skin or bone. KitchenAid Poultry Shears: Another major brand with inadequate performance on our test bird.Cuisinart Deluxe Poultry Shears: A disappointing performance from a major brand in the kitchenware game-these shears struggle with both skin and bone.Chef Remi Utility Shears: These Amazon bestsellers are in the same boat with Kai and Mairico: Great for snipping away at skin, useless against bone.Mairico Premium Kitchen Shears: Another Amazon fan-favorite that is quite adept at snipping skin, but there’s no chance of these shears cutting through bone.Kai Kitchen Scissors: These kitchen shears boast excellent reviews on Amazon and they did pass the skin-snipping test with flying colors, but cutting through bone was impossible.Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik The Competition
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |